How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. TRUE ANC vs TAT3509

defunc TRUE ANC vs Philips TAT3509

What TRUE ANC does better (1) and where TAT3509 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

defunc TRUE ANC
defunc · 2024TRUE ANC
5.2Score
1 advantage≈ $40
vs
Philips TAT3509
Philips · 2024TAT3509
5.9Score
1 advantage≈ $35
Higher score
7.2Noise control & calls7.2
3.0Battery4.7
5.2Build & features5.2

Why is TRUE ANC better than TAT3509?

  1. Charging time1.5 h vs 2 h+33%

Why is TAT3509 better than TRUE ANC?

  1. Battery life5 h vs 8 h+60%
Specifications

Side by side

defunc TRUE ANCdefunc TRUE ANC≈ $405.2
Philips TAT3509Philips TAT3509≈ $355.9
Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Ear cup design—Closed-back
Driver type—Dynamic
Driver size10 mm10 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance—16 Ω
Sensitivity—104 dB
Hi-Res Audio—Yes
Adjustable equaliserYesYes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Transparency / ambient modeYesYes
Battery & charging
Battery life5 h8 h
Battery life with ANC—6 h
Total with charging case—24 h
Charging time1.5 h2 h
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.35.3
Bluetooth codecsAAC, SBCLC3, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)NoNo
aptXNoNo
LDACNoNo
Multipoint (two devices)—Yes
LE Audio—Yes
USB-CYesYes
Design & build
Weight45 g45 g
Protection ratingIPX4IPX4
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx4
Features
Touch controlsYesYes
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare