How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Mondo vs TAA4216BK/00

defunc Mondo vs Philips TAA4216BK/00

What Mondo does better (3) and where TAA4216BK/00 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

defunc Mondo
defunc · 2024Mondo
6.9Score
3 advantages≈ $50
Higher score
vs
Philips TAA4216BK/00
Philips · 2021TAA4216BK/00
6.0Score
2 advantages≈ $50
9.2Noise control & calls3.8
4.4Battery5.4

Why is Mondo better than TAA4216BK/00?

  1. Active noise cancellingYes · TAA4216BK/00: No
  2. Bluetooth version5.3 vs 5+6%
  3. Charging time1.5 h vs 2 h+33%

Why is TAA4216BK/00 better than Mondo?

  1. Battery life28 h vs 35 h+25%
  2. Driver size32 mm vs 40 mm+25%
Specifications

Side by side

defunc Mondodefunc Mondo≈ $506.9
Sound
Fit—On-ear
Ear cup design—Closed-back
Driver type—Dynamic
Driver size32 mm40 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance—32 Ω
Sensitivity—118 dB
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesNo
Battery & charging
Battery life28 h35 h
Battery capacity200 mAh—
Charging time1.5 h2 h
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.35
USB-CYesYes
Design & build
Weight—214 g
Protection rating—IP55
Water resistance (IPx)—IPx5
Dust protection (IP)—5
Foldable—Yes
Colours—Black
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare