vs
7.9Noise control & calls6.6
7.6Battery3.6
Why is MONDO OVER-EAR ANC better than WH-1000XM4C Apache 207 Collaboration?
- Battery life55 h vs 34 h+62%
Why is WH-1000XM4C Apache 207 Collaboration better than MONDO OVER-EAR ANC?
- Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No · MONDO OVER-EAR ANC: Yes
- Lowest frequency20 Hz vs 4 Hz5×
- Weight314 g vs 253 g+24%
- Highest frequency20,000 Hz vs 40,000 Hz2×
- LDACNo · MONDO OVER-EAR ANC: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | — | Over-ear |
| Ear cup design | — | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 40 mm | 40 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 4 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 40,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 32 Ω | — |
| Sensitivity | 95 dB | 106 dB |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | Yes |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | Yes |
| Adaptive ANC | — | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | Yes |
| Microphones | — | 5 |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 55 h | 34 h |
| Battery life with ANC | — | 27 h |
| Charging time | 1.5 h | — |
| Fast charging support | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 6 | 6 |
| Bluetooth codecs | AAC, SBC | LDAC, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | Yes |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | No | Yes |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Voice assistant | — | Google Assistant |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 314 g | 253 g |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | — | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Audio Technica ATH-AL5NCvsdefunc MONDO OVER-EAR ANC9.08.6
vsSennheiser HD 480 Provsdefunc MONDO OVER-EAR ANC
vsV-MODA M-100 PROvsdefunc MONDO OVER-EAR ANCvs
defunc MONDO OVER-EAR ANCvsSennheiser HDR 275
vs
Sony WH-1000XM4C Apache 207 CollaborationvsBose QuietComfort Headphones (2nd Gen)5.45.6vsSennheiser HD 480 ProvsSony WH-1000XM4C Apache 207 Collaboration