How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Triton 600 Knochenschall-Kopfhörer Bluetooth 6.0, MP3 32GB, IP68 vs Endurance Pace

D-Jix Triton 600 Knochenschall-Kopfhörer Bluetooth 6.0, MP3 32GB, IP68 vs JBL Endurance Pace

What Triton 600 Knochenschall-Kopfhörer Bluetooth 6.0, MP3 32GB, IP68 does better (5) and where Endurance Pace wins (0) — every spec side by side.

vs
JBL Endurance Pace
JBL · 2025Endurance Pace
5.6Score
0 advantages≈ $75
Higher score
7.1Battery4.7

Why is Triton 600 Knochenschall-Kopfhörer Bluetooth 6.0, MP3 32GB, IP68 better than Endurance Pace?

  1. Battery life15 h vs 10 h+50%
  2. Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx7+14%
  3. Bluetooth version6 vs 5.4+11%
  4. Driver size32 mm vs 18 mm+78%
  5. Charging time2.5 h vs 4 h+60%

Why is Endurance Pace better than Triton 600 Knochenschall-Kopfhörer Bluetooth 6.0, MP3 32GB, IP68?

Endurance Pace has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitBone conductionOpen-ear
Ear cup design—Open-back
Driver type—Dynamic
Driver size32 mm18 mm
Lowest frequency—20 Hz
Highest frequency—20,000 Hz
Impedance220 Ω32 Ω
Sensitivity—104 dB
Noise control
Microphones—2
Battery & charging
Battery life15 h10 h
Charging time2.5 h4 h
Fast charging supportYesYes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version65.4
Multipoint (two devices)—Yes
Design & build
Weight—33 g
Protection ratingIP68—
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx7
Dust protection (IP)6—
ColoursBlack—
Features
Hands-free callsYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare