Why is X-VIBES better than IE 900?
X-VIBES has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is IE 900 better than X-VIBES?
- Weight34 g vs 4 g8.5×
- Lowest frequency20 Hz vs 5 Hz4×
- Highest frequency20,000 Hz vs 48,000 Hz2.4×
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Bone conduction | In-ear |
| Driver size | — | 7 mm |
| Number of drivers | — | 1 |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 5 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 48,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 8 Ω | 16 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 88 dB | 123 dB |
| Noise control | ||
| Noise reduction for calls | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 14 h | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth version | 5.1 | — |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 34 g | 4 g |
| Protection rating | IP67 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx7 | — |
| Dust protection (IP) | 6 | — |
| Colours | Black | Silver |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | — |
