Why is X-VIBES better than Ne HP-R100BT?
- Battery life14 h vs 8 h+75%
Why is Ne HP-R100BT better than X-VIBES?
- Lowest frequency20 Hz vs 5 Hz4×
- Highest frequency20,000 Hz vs 40,000 Hz2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Bone conduction | In-ear |
| Driver type | — | Dynamic |
| Driver size | — | 7 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 5 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 40,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 8 Ω | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 88 dB | 96 dB |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Noise reduction for calls | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 14 h | 8 h |
| Charging time | — | 2 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.1 | 5 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | LDAC, aptX HD, aptX, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | Yes |
| aptX | — | Yes |
| LDAC | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 34 g | — |
| Protection rating | IP67 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx7 | — |
| Dust protection (IP) | 6 | — |
| Colours | Black | — |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
