vs
2.0Noise control & calls7.9
Why is Outlier GO TWS better than Life Q30 (2nd Gen)?
Outlier GO TWS has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Life Q30 (2nd Gen) better than Outlier GO TWS?
- Battery life6 h vs 70 h11.7×
- Active noise cancellingNo · Outlier GO TWS: Yes
- Driver size14.2 mm vs 40 mm2.8×
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | On-ear | — |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | — |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 14.2 mm | 40 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | — | 16 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 100 dB | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | Yes |
| Adjustable equaliser | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | — | Yes |
| Microphones | 2 | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 6 h | 70 h |
| Charging time | — | 2 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | No |
| aptX | — | No |
| LDAC | — | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | — | 260 g |
| Protection rating | IPX4 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Foldable | — | Yes |
| Colours | Black | — |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | — | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | — | Yes |
