vs
6.1Noise control & calls5.1
3.9Battery5.9
8.4Build & features5.4
Why is Aurvana Ace better than Ear?
- Microphones6 vs 23×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx4+25%
- aptXYes · Ear: No
- Earbud weight (each)4.7 g vs 4.8 g+2%
Why is Ear better than Aurvana Ace?
- Battery life6 h vs 8 h+33%
- Total with charging case24 h vs 40 h+69%
- Battery life with ANC4 h vs 5.5 h+38%
- LDACNo · Aurvana Ace: Yes
- Driver size10 mm vs 11 mm+10%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 10 mm | 11 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 5 Hz | — |
| Highest frequency | 40,000 Hz | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | Yes |
| Adjustable equaliser | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | Yes |
| Adaptive ANC | Yes | — |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | Yes |
| Microphones | 6 | 2 |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 6 h | 8 h |
| Battery life with ANC | 4 h | 5.5 h |
| Total with charging case | 24 h | 40 h |
| Battery capacity | 52 mAh | — |
| Charging time | 1 h | — |
| Quick charge (claimed) | 10 min → 1 h | 10 min → 10 h |
| Fast charging support | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging (case) | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth codecs | aptX Adaptive, aptX, LC3, AAC, SBC | LDAC, LHDC, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | Yes |
| aptX | Yes | No |
| LDAC | No | Yes |
| Multipoint (two devices) | — | Yes |
| LE Audio | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Low-latency game mode | — | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Voice assistant | Google Assistant, Siri | — |
| Companion app | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | — | 52 g |
| Earbud weight (each) | 4.7 g | 4.8 g |
| Protection rating | IPX5 | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx4 |
| Dust protection (IP) | — | 5 |
| Colours | Black | — |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | — |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
