vs
6.1Noise control & calls7.2
3.8Battery2.4
Why is Aurvana Ace 2 better than E3?
- Battery life6 h vs 4.5 h+33%
- Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes · E3: No
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx4+25%
- aptXYes · E3: No
Why is E3 better than Aurvana Ace 2?
E3 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | — |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 10 mm | 10 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 5 Hz | — |
| Highest frequency | 40,000 Hz | — |
| Impedance | — | 16 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 99 dB |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | Yes |
| Adaptive ANC | Yes | — |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | Yes |
| Microphones | 6 | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 6 h | 4.5 h |
| Battery life with ANC | 4 h | — |
| Total with charging case | 24 h | — |
| Battery capacity | 52 mAh | — |
| Charging time | 1 h | — |
| Quick charge (claimed) | 10 min → 1 h | — |
| Fast charging support | Yes | — |
| Wireless charging (case) | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth codecs | aptX Lossless, aptX Adaptive, aptX, LC3, AAC, SBC | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | No |
| aptX | Yes | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | — | Yes |
| LE Audio | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Voice assistant | Google Assistant, Siri | — |
| Companion app | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | — | 51 g |
| Protection rating | IPX5 | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx4 |
| Colours | Black | — |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | — | Yes |
