How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Brendan vs TAE4105

Conceptronic Brendan vs Philips TAE4105

What Brendan does better (1) and where TAE4105 wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Conceptronic Brendan
Conceptronic · 2020Brendan
3.6Score
1 advantage≈ $12
Higher score
vs
Philips TAE4105
Philips · 2020TAE4105
0 advantages≈ $17

Why is Brendan better than TAE4105?

  1. Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx22×

Why is TAE4105 better than Brendan?

TAE4105 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitNeckbandIn-ear
Ear cup design—Closed-back
Driver type—Dynamic
Driver size—10 mm
Number of drivers—1
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance16 Ω32 Ω
Sensitivity—104 dB
Battery & charging
Battery life5 h—
Battery capacity110 mAh—
Charging time1.5 h—
Connectivity
WirelessYesNo
Bluetooth version5—
3.5 mm jack / AUX—Yes
Design & build
Weight400 g—
Protection ratingIPX4IPX2
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx2
ColoursBlack—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare