vs
4.0Noise control & calls6.0
4.9Battery5.6
Why is Lacoste Over-Ear Bluetooth Headphones LH04 LCWHPH083 better than WH-CH535?
- Charging time2 h vs 3 h+50%
- Driver size40 mm vs 30 mm+33%
Why is WH-CH535 better than Lacoste Over-Ear Bluetooth Headphones LH04 LCWHPH083?
- Battery life32 h vs 55 h+72%
- Bluetooth version5.4 vs 6+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Over-ear | On-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 40 mm | 30 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | Yes |
| Adjustable equaliser | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | No |
| Noise reduction for calls | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 32 h | 55 h |
| Battery capacity | — | 150 mAh |
| Charging time | 2 h | 3 h |
| Quick charge (claimed) | — | 3 min → 1,5 h |
| Fast charging support | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 6 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | LC3, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | No |
| aptX | — | No |
| LDAC | — | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | — | Yes |
| LE Audio | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | — | 150 g |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
JBL Tune 735BTvsCG Mobile Lacoste Over-Ear Bluetooth Headphones LH04 LCWHPH083
vs
JBL TUNE 530BTvsCG Mobile Lacoste Over-Ear Bluetooth Headphones LH04 LCWHPH083
vs
Xiaomi NeovsCG Mobile Lacoste Over-Ear Bluetooth Headphones LH04 LCWHPH083
vs
JVC HA-S59WvsCG Mobile Lacoste Over-Ear Bluetooth Headphones LH04 LCWHPH083
vs
Xiaomi NeovsSony WH-CH535
