How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. BMW M BMBHMIASPV083MCA vs TAH6509

CG Mobile BMW M BMBHMIASPV083MCA vs Philips TAH6509

What BMW M BMBHMIASPV083MCA does better (0) and where TAH6509 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

CG Mobile BMW M BMBHMIASPV083MCA
CG Mobile · 2026BMW M BMBHMIASPV083MCA
0 advantages≈ $65
vs
Philips TAH6509
Philips · 2024TAH6509
9.4Score
1 advantage≈ $65
Higher score
4.0Noise control & calls9.2

Why is BMW M BMBHMIASPV083MCA better than TAH6509?

BMW M BMBHMIASPV083MCA has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is TAH6509 better than BMW M BMBHMIASPV083MCA?

  1. Active noise cancellingNo · BMW M BMBHMIASPV083MCA: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Philips TAH6509Philips TAH6509≈ $659.4
Sound
FitOn-earOver-ear
Ear cup design—Closed-back
Driver type—Dynamic
Lowest frequency—20 Hz
Highest frequency—40,000 Hz
Hi-Res Audio—Yes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNoYes
Battery & charging
Battery life—70 h
Battery life with ANC—45 h
Battery capacity70 mAh—
Charging time—2 h
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.45.3
Bluetooth codecs—SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—No
aptX—No
LDAC—No
USB-CYes—
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
Design & build
Protection ratingIPX4—
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4—
Foldable—Yes
ColoursBlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare