How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. earU ER-100SH-WY vs GLASS Core KH-CRZ90T

Casio earU ER-100SH-WY vs Kenwood GLASS Core KH-CRZ90T

What earU ER-100SH-WY does better (2) and where GLASS Core KH-CRZ90T wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Casio earU ER-100SH-WY
Casio · 2026earU ER-100SH-WY
7.9Score
2 advantages≈ $320
Higher score
vs
Kenwood GLASS Core KH-CRZ90T
Kenwood · 2026GLASS Core KH-CRZ90T
7.8Score
5 advantages≈ $170
9.7Battery8.9
2.6Build & features3.9

Why is earU ER-100SH-WY better than GLASS Core KH-CRZ90T?

  1. aptXYes · GLASS Core KH-CRZ90T: No
  2. Charging time1.5 h vs 2 h+33%

Why is GLASS Core KH-CRZ90T better than earU ER-100SH-WY?

  1. Battery life14 h vs 17 h+21%
  2. Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No · earU ER-100SH-WY: Yes
  3. LDACNo · earU ER-100SH-WY: Yes
  4. Bluetooth version5.4 vs 6+11%
  5. Earbud weight (each)8 g vs 5.8 g+37%
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitOpen-earIn-ear
Ear cup designOpen-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamic—
Driver size10 mm10 mm
Hi-Res Audio—Yes
Adjustable equaliserYesYes
Noise control
Active noise cancelling—Yes
Transparency / ambient mode—Yes
Battery & charging
Battery life14 h17 h
Charging time1.5 h2 h
Wireless charging (case)—Yes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.46
Bluetooth codecsaptX, AAC, SBCLDAC, AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)NoYes
aptXYesNo
LDACNoYes
Multipoint (two devices)YesYes
USB-CYes—
Design & build
Earbud weight (each)8 g5.8 g
Protection ratingIPX4IPX4
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx4
Features
Touch controls—Yes
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare