How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Melomania P100 SE vs Monitor III ANC

Cambridge Audio Melomania P100 SE vs Marshall Monitor III ANC

What Melomania P100 SE does better (2) and where Monitor III ANC wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Cambridge Audio Melomania P100 SE
Cambridge Audio · 2025Melomania P100 SE
9.5Score
2 advantages≈ $250
Higher score
vs
Marshall Monitor III ANC
Marshall · 2024Monitor III ANC
7.1Score
1 advantage≈ $270
6.2Noise control & calls7.8
9.4Battery8.2

Why is Melomania P100 SE better than Monitor III ANC?

  1. Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes · Monitor III ANC: No
  2. aptXYes · Monitor III ANC: No

Why is Monitor III ANC better than Melomania P100 SE?

  1. Battery life with ANC60 h vs 70 h+17%
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitOn-earOver-ear
Ear cup designClosed-back—
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size—32 mm
Lowest frequency—20 Hz
Highest frequency—20,000 Hz
Impedance—46 Ω
Sensitivity—92 dB
Spatial / 3D audio—Yes
Hi-Res AudioYes—
Adjustable equaliserYes—
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Adaptive ANCYes—
Transparency / ambient modeYesYes
Microphones5—
Battery & charging
Battery life100 h100 h
Battery life with ANC60 h70 h
Charging time—3 h
Fast charging supportYesYes
Wireless charging (case)—No
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.35.3
Bluetooth codecsaptX Lossless, aptX Adaptive, AAC, SBCAAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)YesNo
aptXYesNo
LDACNoNo
Multipoint (two devices)Yes—
LE Audio—Yes
USB-CYesYes
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
Low-latency game modeYes—
Design & build
Weight—250 g
Water resistance (IPx)—IPx0
Foldable—Yes
Features
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare