vs
9.4Battery9.5
Why is Melomania P100 SE better than ED-STXSPTS3?
- Battery life100 h vs 80 h+25%
Why is ED-STXSPTS3 better than Melomania P100 SE?
ED-STXSPTS3 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | On-ear | Over-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | — |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Planar magnetic |
| Driver size | — | 89 mm |
| Lowest frequency | — | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | — | 40,000 Hz |
| Impedance | — | 24 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 94 dB |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | Yes |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | — |
| Adaptive ANC | Yes | — |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | — |
| Microphones | 5 | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 100 h | 80 h |
| Battery life with ANC | 60 h | — |
| Charging time | — | 1.5 h |
| Fast charging support | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth codecs | aptX Lossless, aptX Adaptive, AAC, SBC | aptX Adaptive, aptX HD, aptX, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | Yes |
| aptX | Yes | Yes |
| LDAC | No | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | Yes |
| Low-latency game mode | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | — | 329 g |
| Foldable | — | Yes |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Sennheiser HD 550vsCambridge Audio Melomania P100 SEvs
Cambridge Audio Melomania P100 SEvsbeyerdynamic DT 990 PRO Xvs
Cambridge Audio Melomania P100 SEvsV-MODA M-100 PROvs
Cambridge Audio Melomania P100 SEvsEdifier ES850NB9.59.6
vs
Edifier ED-STXSPTS3vsEdifier ED-STXSPTS5vs
Edifier ED-STXSPTS3vsAVIOT WA-Z1PNK