How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. L/R S vs Fidelio TAFA3/10

Cambridge Audio L/R S vs Philips Fidelio TAFA3/10

What L/R S does better (2) and where Fidelio TAFA3/10 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Cambridge Audio L/R S
Cambridge Audio · 2026L/R S
2 advantages≈ $540
vs
Philips Fidelio TAFA3/10
Philips · 2026Fidelio TAFA3/10
9.5Score
3 advantages
Higher score
9.4Sound9.7
Dimensions

Size comparison

L/R SFidelio TAFA3/10
134 × 226180170 × 303211
L/R SFidelio TAFA3/10Difference
Height226 mm303 mm−77 mm
Width134 mm170 mm−36 mm
Depth180 mm211 mm−31 mm
Weight3,000 g3,399 g−399 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is L/R S better than Fidelio TAFA3/10?

  1. aptXYes · Fidelio TAFA3/10: No
  2. Weight3,000 g vs 3,399 g+13%

Why is Fidelio TAFA3/10 better than L/R S?

  1. LDACNo · L/R S: Yes
  2. Highest frequency24,000 Hz vs 40,000 Hz+67%
  3. Lowest frequency55 Hz vs 40 Hz+38%
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
Output power100 W100 W
Lowest frequency55 Hz40 Hz
Highest frequency24,000 Hz40,000 Hz
Adjustable equaliserYes—
Battery & charging
Mains poweredYesNo
Battery powered (portable)NoNo
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version—5.4
Bluetooth codecsaptX HD, aptX, AAC, SBCLDAC, LC3, AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)YesYes
aptXYesNo
LDACNoYes
LE Audio—Yes
Auracast—Yes
USB-CYesYes
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
Optical inputYesYes
Design & build
Weight3,000 g3,399 g
Width134 mm170 mm
Height226 mm303 mm
Depth180 mm211 mm
Colours—Black
Features
Remote control—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare