Why is A90 Pro better than TAT2200?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx7 vs IPx4+75%
Why is TAT2200 better than A90 Pro?
- Bluetooth version5.3 vs 6+13%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | — |
| Driver type | Dynamic | — |
| Driver size | 36 mm | — |
| Number of drivers | 4 | — |
| Impedance | 32 Ω | 105 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 105 dB |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 8 h | — |
| Total with charging case | 36 h | — |
| Charging time | — | 3 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 6 |
| Multipoint (two devices) | — | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Voice assistant | — | Google Assistant, Siri |
| Design & build | ||
| Protection rating | — | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx7 | IPx4 |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | — |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
