How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. PX8 vs ALCHEM-E

Bowers & Wilkins PX8 vs Zildjian ALCHEM-E

What PX8 does better (0) and where ALCHEM-E wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Bowers & Wilkins PX8
Bowers & Wilkins · 2022PX8
5.8Score
0 advantages≈ $350
Higher score
vs
Zildjian ALCHEM-E
Zildjian · 2024ALCHEM-E
1 advantage≈ $360
6.4Noise control & calls9.2

Why is PX8 better than ALCHEM-E?

PX8 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is ALCHEM-E better than PX8?

  1. Battery life30 h vs 45 h+50%
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitOver-earOver-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size40 mm40 mm
Lowest frequency—8 Hz
Highest frequency—40,000 Hz
Impedance33 Ω—
Hi-Res AudioYes—
Adjustable equaliserYesYes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Adaptive ANCYes—
Transparency / ambient modeYes—
Battery & charging
Battery life30 h45 h
Battery life with ANC30 h—
Charging time2 h—
Fast charging supportYes—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.25.3
Bluetooth codecsaptX Adaptive, aptX HD, AAC, SBC—
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes—
aptXYes—
LDACNo—
Multipoint (two devices)Yes—
USB-CYes—
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
Design & build
FoldableYes—
Features
Hands-free callsYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare