Why is Pi7 S2 better than EAH-AZ100?
- Lowest frequency10 Hz vs 20 Hz2×
- Charging time1 h vs 2 h2×
- aptXYes · EAH-AZ100: No
Why is EAH-AZ100 better than Pi7 S2?
- Active noise cancellingNo · Pi7 S2: Yes
- Battery life5 h vs 8 h+60%
- Total with charging case21 h vs 29 h+38%
- Highest frequency20,000 Hz vs 40,000 Hz2×
- LDACNo · Pi7 S2: Yes
- Bluetooth version5 vs 5.3+6%
- Earbud weight (each)7 g vs 5.9 g+19%
- Driver size9.2 mm vs 10 mm+9%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 9.2 mm | 10 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 10 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 40,000 Hz |
| Dolby Atmos | — | Yes |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | Yes |
| Adjustable equaliser | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | Yes |
| Noise reduction for calls | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 5 h | 8 h |
| Battery life with ANC | — | 7 h |
| Total with charging case | 21 h | 29 h |
| Charging time | 1 h | 2 h |
| Quick charge (claimed) | 15 min → 2 h | — |
| Fast charging support | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging (case) | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth codecs | aptX Adaptive, aptX, AAC | LDAC, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | Yes |
| aptX | Yes | No |
| LDAC | No | Yes |
| Multipoint (two devices) | — | Yes |
| LE Audio | — | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Low-latency game mode | Yes | — |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Voice assistant | Google Assistant, Siri | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 7 g | 5.9 g |
| Protection rating | IP54 | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Dust protection (IP) | 5 | — |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
