How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Pi7 S2 vs LinkBuds UC for Microsoft Teams WF-L900UC

Bowers & Wilkins Pi7 S2 vs Sony LinkBuds UC for Microsoft Teams WF-L900UC

What Pi7 S2 does better (3) and where LinkBuds UC for Microsoft Teams WF-L900UC wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Bowers & Wilkins Pi7 S2
Bowers & Wilkins · 2022Pi7 S2
4.1Score
3 advantages≈ $300
vs
Sony LinkBuds UC for Microsoft Teams WF-L900UC
4.5Score
4 advantages≈ $210
Higher score
3.6Battery3.3
3.1Build & features6.2

Why is Pi7 S2 better than LinkBuds UC for Microsoft Teams WF-L900UC?

  1. Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes · LinkBuds UC for Microsoft Teams WF-L900UC: No
  2. aptXYes · LinkBuds UC for Microsoft Teams WF-L900UC: No
  3. Charging time1 h vs 1.5 h+50%

Why is LinkBuds UC for Microsoft Teams WF-L900UC better than Pi7 S2?

  1. Battery life5 h vs 5.5 h+10%
  2. Earbud weight (each)7 g vs 4.1 g+71%
  3. Bluetooth version5 vs 5.2+4%
  4. Driver size9.2 mm vs 12 mm+30%
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitIn-earOpen-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backOpen-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size9.2 mm12 mm
Lowest frequency10 Hz—
Highest frequency20,000 Hz—
Adjustable equaliser—Yes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNo—
Transparency / ambient modeYes—
Battery & charging
Battery life5 h5.5 h
Total with charging case21 h—
Charging time1 h1.5 h
Quick charge (claimed)15 min → 2 h—
Fast charging supportYes—
Wireless charging (case)Yes—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version55.2
Bluetooth codecsaptX Adaptive, aptX, AACAAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)YesNo
aptXYesNo
LDACNoNo
USB-CYesYes
Low-latency game modeYes—
Smart & streaming
Voice assistantGoogle Assistant, Siri—
Design & build
Earbud weight (each)7 g4.1 g
Protection ratingIP54IPX4
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx4
Dust protection (IP)5—
Features
Touch controlsYesYes
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare