vs
7.4Battery4.9
Why is Ultra Open Earbuds (2nd Gen) better than Comfo C?
- Battery life9 h vs 7 h+29%
- Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes · Comfo C: No
- aptXYes · Comfo C: No
Why is Comfo C better than Ultra Open Earbuds (2nd Gen)?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx6+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | Open-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | — |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | — | 12 mm |
| Lowest frequency | — | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | — | 20,000 Hz |
| Sensitivity | — | 90 dB |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | — |
| Microphones | 2 | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 9 h | 7 h |
| Total with charging case | — | 28 h |
| Charging time | 1 h | 1 h |
| Wireless charging (case) | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth codecs | aptX Adaptive, AAC, SBC | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | No |
| aptX | Yes | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Companion app | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 10 g | — |
| Protection rating | IPX4 | IP56 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx6 |
| Dust protection (IP) | — | 5 |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | — |
