vs
2.0Noise control & calls7.2
5.3Battery3.7
Why is Sport Open Earbuds better than Osprey?
Sport Open Earbuds has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Osprey better than Sport Open Earbuds?
- Active noise cancellingNo · Sport Open Earbuds: Yes
- Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No · Sport Open Earbuds: Yes
- LDACNo · Sport Open Earbuds: Yes
- Bluetooth version5.4 vs 6+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Open-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Hybrid |
| Driver size | — | 10 mm |
| Lowest frequency | — | 10 Hz |
| Highest frequency | — | 40,000 Hz |
| Impedance | — | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 104 dB |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | — | Yes |
| Microphones | 2 | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 7 h | 7 h |
| Battery life with ANC | — | 5 h |
| Total with charging case | 29 h | — |
| Charging time | 1 h | — |
| Wireless charging (case) | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 6 |
| Bluetooth codecs | AAC, SBC | LDAC, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | Yes |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | No | Yes |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Companion app | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 10 g | — |
| Protection rating | IP54 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Dust protection (IP) | 5 | — |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | — | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Bose Sport Open EarbudsvsRick and Morty Space Cruiser TWS-Ohrhörer
vs
Bose Sport Open EarbudsvsSoundcore R50i NC
vs
Bose Sport Open EarbudsvsEdifier A6
vs
Bose Sport Open EarbudsvsEdifier Comfo Flex
vs
Sennheiser Accentum ClipvsNoble Audio Osprey5.85.9
vs
Noble Audio OspreyvsRick and Morty Space Cruiser TWS-Ohrhörer
