How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. SoundLink Micro Portable Speaker ) (2nd Gen) vs Soft Bumble Speaker

Bose SoundLink Micro Portable Speaker ) (2nd Gen) vs Hoptimist Soft Bumble Speaker

What SoundLink Micro Portable Speaker ) (2nd Gen) does better (2) and where Soft Bumble Speaker wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Bose SoundLink Micro Portable Speaker ) (2nd Gen)
6.3Score
2 advantages≈ $80
Higher score
vs
Hoptimist Soft Bumble Speaker
Hoptimist · 2025Soft Bumble Speaker
0 advantages≈ $75
4.6Battery2.2

Why is SoundLink Micro Portable Speaker ) (2nd Gen) better than Soft Bumble Speaker?

  1. Battery life12 h vs 8 h+50%
  2. Charging time3 h vs 8 h2.7×

Why is Soft Bumble Speaker better than SoundLink Micro Portable Speaker ) (2nd Gen)?

Soft Bumble Speaker has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Sound
Output power—5 W
Speaker channelsMono—
StereoNo—
Battery & charging
Battery life12 h8 h
Charging time3 h8 h
Mains powered—No
Battery powered (portable)YesYes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.4—
Bluetooth codecs—SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—No
aptX—No
LDAC—No
USB-CYesYes
Smart & streaming
Spotify ConnectYes—
Companion appYes—
Design & build
Width104 mm—
Height43 mm—
Depth104 mm—
Protection ratingIP67—
Water resistance (IPx)IPx7—
Dust protection (IP)6—
Features
Party / stereo pairingYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare