How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. SoundLink Flex vs Emberton II

Bose SoundLink Flex vs Marshall Emberton II

What SoundLink Flex does better (1) and where Emberton II wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Bose SoundLink Flex
Bose · 2021SoundLink Flex
1 advantage≈ $120
vs
Marshall Emberton II
Marshall · 2022Emberton II
8.1Score
3 advantages≈ $130
Higher score
3.4Build & features7.6
Dimensions

Size comparison

SoundLink FlexEmberton II
201 × 9052160 × 6876
SoundLink FlexEmberton IIDifference
Height90 mm68 mm+22 mm
Width201 mm160 mm+41 mm
Depth52 mm76 mm−24 mm
Weight600 g700 g−100 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is SoundLink Flex better than Emberton II?

  1. Weight600 g vs 700 g+17%

Why is Emberton II better than SoundLink Flex?

  1. Battery life12 h vs 30 h2.5×
  2. Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx7+75%
  3. Bluetooth version4.2 vs 5.1+21%
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
Driver type—Dynamic
Driver size—50.8 mm
Output power—20 W
Speaker channels—2.0
Channel count—2
Lowest frequency—60 Hz
Highest frequency—20,000 Hz
Adjustable equaliser—Yes
Stereo—Yes
Battery & charging
Battery life12 h30 h
Charging time—3 h
Quick charge (claimed)—20 min → 4 h
Fast charging support—Yes
Mains poweredNoNo
Battery powered (portable)YesYes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version4.25.1
Bluetooth codecsSBCSBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)NoNo
aptXNoNo
LDACNoNo
USB-CYesYes
Smart & streaming
Wi-Fi—Yes
Companion app—Yes
Design & build
Weight600 g700 g
Width201 mm160 mm
Height90 mm68 mm
Depth52 mm76 mm
Protection rating—IP67
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx7
Dust protection (IP)—6
Features
Hands-free callsYes—
Party / stereo pairing—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare