How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. SoundLink Flex Portable Speaker ) (2nd Gen) vs AQUOS AN-SS3

Bose SoundLink Flex Portable Speaker ) (2nd Gen) vs Sharp AQUOS AN-SS3

What SoundLink Flex Portable Speaker ) (2nd Gen) does better (1) and where AQUOS AN-SS3 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Bose SoundLink Flex Portable Speaker ) (2nd Gen)
5.7Score
1 advantage≈ $100
Higher score
vs
Sharp AQUOS AN-SS3
Sharp · 2023AQUOS AN-SS3
1 advantage≈ $100
Dimensions

Size comparison

SoundLink Flex Portable Speaker ) (2nd Gen)AQUOS AN-SS3
201.4 × 52.390.4184 × 18185
SoundLink Flex Portable Speaker ) (2nd Gen)AQUOS AN-SS3Difference
Height52.3 mm18 mm+34.3 mm
Width201.4 mm184 mm+17.4 mm
Depth90.4 mm185 mm−94.6 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is SoundLink Flex Portable Speaker ) (2nd Gen) better than AQUOS AN-SS3?

  1. Water resistance (IPx)IPx7 vs IPx4+75%

Why is AQUOS AN-SS3 better than SoundLink Flex Portable Speaker ) (2nd Gen)?

  1. Battery life12 h vs 16 h+33%
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
Speaker channelsMono—
StereoNo—
Battery & charging
Battery life12 h16 h
Charging time4 h—
Battery powered (portable)YesYes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.35.3
USB-CYes—
3.5 mm jack / AUX—Yes
Smart & streaming
Spotify ConnectYes—
Companion appYes—
Design & build
Width201 mm184 mm
Height52 mm18 mm
Depth90 mm185 mm
Protection ratingIP67IPX4
Water resistance (IPx)IPx7IPx4
Dust protection (IP)6—
Features
Hands-free callsYesYes
Party / stereo pairingYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare