vs
Why is SoundLink Flex Bluetooth speaker better than Revive?
SoundLink Flex Bluetooth speaker has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Revive better than SoundLink Flex Bluetooth speaker?
- Bluetooth version4.2 vs 5+19%
Specifications
Side by side
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 12 h | — |
| Mains powered | — | Yes |
| Battery powered (portable) | Yes | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 4.2 | 5 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | No |
| aptX | — | No |
| LDAC | — | No |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Width | 201 mm | — |
| Height | 90 mm | — |
| Depth | 52 mm | — |
| Protection rating | IP67 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx7 | — |
| Dust protection (IP) | 6 | — |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | — |
| Party / stereo pairing | Yes | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Marshall Emberton IIvsBose SoundLink Flex Bluetooth speaker
vsSony SRS-XE300vsBose SoundLink Flex Bluetooth speaker
vsYamaha True X-Lautsprecher WS-X1AvsBose SoundLink Flex Bluetooth speakervs
Marshall Emberton IIvsTivoli Revive
vsMarshall MiddletonvsTivoli RevivevsTivoli RevivevsYamaha True X-Lautsprecher WS-X1A