How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. SoundLink Flex (2nd Gen) vs Emberton III

Bose SoundLink Flex (2nd Gen) vs Marshall Emberton III

What SoundLink Flex (2nd Gen) does better (1) and where Emberton III wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Bose SoundLink Flex (2nd Gen)
6.2Score
1 advantage≈ $130
vs
Marshall Emberton III
Marshall · 2024Emberton III
8.6Score
2 advantages≈ $140
Higher score
4.1Battery9.6
8.6Build & features8.2

Why is SoundLink Flex (2nd Gen) better than Emberton III?

  1. Weight590 g vs 670 g+14%

Why is Emberton III better than SoundLink Flex (2nd Gen)?

  1. Battery life12 h vs 32 h2.7×
  2. Charging time4 h vs 2 h2×
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
Driver type—Dynamic
Driver size—50.8 mm
Output power—38 W
Speaker channels—2.0
Channel count—2
Lowest frequency—65 Hz
Highest frequency—20,000 Hz
Adjustable equaliser—Yes
Stereo—Yes
Battery & charging
Battery life12 h32 h
Charging time4 h2 h
Quick charge (claimed)—20 min → 6 h
Fast charging support—Yes
Mains poweredNoNo
Battery powered (portable)YesYes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.35.3
Bluetooth codecsSBCSBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)NoNo
aptXNoNo
LDACNoNo
Multipoint (two devices)—Yes
LE Audio—Yes
Auracast—Yes
USB-CYesYes
Smart & streaming
Companion appYesYes
Design & build
Weight590 g670 g
Width201 mm160 mm
Height904 mm68 mm
Depth52 mm77 mm
Protection ratingIP67IP67
Water resistance (IPx)IPx7IPx7
Dust protection (IP)66
Features
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare