How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. QuietComfort Ultra Earbuds (2nd Gen) vs EAH-AZ100

Bose QuietComfort Ultra Earbuds (2nd Gen) vs Technics EAH-AZ100

What QuietComfort Ultra Earbuds (2nd Gen) does better (2) and where EAH-AZ100 wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Bose QuietComfort Ultra Earbuds (2nd Gen)
4.8Score
2 advantages≈ $230
vs
Technics EAH-AZ100
Technics · 2025EAH-AZ100
6.5Score
6 advantages≈ $280
Higher score
5.5Noise control & calls6.0
3.7Battery5.6
2.3Build & features3.8

Why is QuietComfort Ultra Earbuds (2nd Gen) better than EAH-AZ100?

  1. Charging time1 h vs 2 h2×
  2. aptXYes · EAH-AZ100: No

Why is EAH-AZ100 better than QuietComfort Ultra Earbuds (2nd Gen)?

  1. Battery life6 h vs 8 h+33%
  2. Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No · QuietComfort Ultra Earbuds (2nd Gen): Yes
  3. Battery life with ANC4 h vs 7 h+75%
  4. Total with charging case24 h vs 29 h+21%
  5. LDACNo · QuietComfort Ultra Earbuds (2nd Gen): Yes
  6. Earbud weight (each)10 g vs 5.9 g+69%
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size—10 mm
Lowest frequency—20 Hz
Highest frequency—40,000 Hz
Spatial / 3D audioYes—
Dolby Atmos—Yes
Hi-Res AudioYesYes
Adjustable equaliserYesYes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Adaptive ANCYes—
Transparency / ambient modeYesYes
Microphones4—
Noise reduction for calls—Yes
Battery & charging
Battery life6 h8 h
Battery life with ANC4 h7 h
Total with charging case24 h29 h
Charging time1 h2 h
Fast charging supportYesYes
Wireless charging (case)YesYes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.35.3
Bluetooth codecsaptXLDAC, AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)NoYes
aptXYesNo
LDACNoYes
Multipoint (two devices)YesYes
LE Audio—Yes
USB-CYesYes
Smart & streaming
Companion appYes—
Design & build
Earbud weight (each)10 g5.9 g
Protection ratingIPX4IPX4
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx4
Features
Touch controlsYesYes
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare