How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. QuietComfort Ultra (2nd Gen) vs ALCHEM-E

Bose QuietComfort Ultra (2nd Gen) vs Zildjian ALCHEM-E

What QuietComfort Ultra (2nd Gen) does better (0) and where ALCHEM-E wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Bose QuietComfort Ultra (2nd Gen)
7.5Score
0 advantages≈ $330
Higher score
vs
Zildjian ALCHEM-E
Zildjian · 2024ALCHEM-E
1 advantage≈ $360
9.2Noise control & calls9.2

Why is QuietComfort Ultra (2nd Gen) better than ALCHEM-E?

QuietComfort Ultra (2nd Gen) has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is ALCHEM-E better than QuietComfort Ultra (2nd Gen)?

  1. Battery life30 h vs 45 h+50%
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitOver-earOver-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size—40 mm
Lowest frequency—8 Hz
Highest frequency—40,000 Hz
Spatial / 3D audioYes—
Adjustable equaliserYesYes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Battery & charging
Battery life30 h45 h
Battery capacity850 mAh—
Charging time3 h—
Quick charge (claimed)15 min → 2,5 h—
Fast charging supportYes—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.45.3
Bluetooth codecsAAC, SBC—
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No—
aptXNo—
LDACNo—
USB-CYes—
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
Smart & streaming
Voice assistantSiri—
Companion appYes—
Features
Hands-free callsYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare