How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Kabelgebundene Noise-Cancelling-Earbuds vs TAT1300

Bose Kabelgebundene Noise-Cancelling-Earbuds vs Philips TAT1300

What Kabelgebundene Noise-Cancelling-Earbuds does better (1) and where TAT1300 wins (0) — every spec side by side.

vs
Philips TAT1300
Philips · 2026TAT1300
4.1Score
0 advantages≈ $18
Higher score
9.2Noise control & calls3.1

Why is Kabelgebundene Noise-Cancelling-Earbuds better than TAT1300?

  1. Active noise cancellingYes · TAT1300: No

Why is TAT1300 better than Kabelgebundene Noise-Cancelling-Earbuds?

TAT1300 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Philips TAT1300Philips TAT1300≈ $184.1
Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Ear cup designClosed-back—
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size—10 mm
Lowest frequency—20 Hz
Highest frequency—20,000 Hz
Impedance—105 Ω
Sensitivity—105 dB
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesNo
Battery & charging
Battery life—6 h
Charging time—3 h
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version—6
Bluetooth codecs—SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—No
aptX—No
LDAC—No
Multipoint (two devices)—Yes
USB-CYesYes
Smart & streaming
Voice assistant—Google Assistant, Siri
Design & build
Weight—34 g
Protection ratingIPX4IPX4
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx4
ColoursWhite—
Features
Touch controls—Yes
Hands-free calls—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare