3.0Noise control & calls9.3
Why is Rockerz 255 Pro better than TAT3000?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx7 vs IPx4+75%
Why is TAT3000 better than Rockerz 255 Pro?
- Active noise cancellingNo · Rockerz 255 Pro: Yes
- Bluetooth version5 vs 6+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | — |
| Driver type | Dynamic | — |
| Impedance | 255 Ω | — |
| Sensitivity | — | 106 dB |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | 500 mAh | — |
| Charging time | — | 3 h |
| Fast charging support | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 6 |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Voice assistant | — | Google Assistant, Siri |
| Design & build | ||
| Protection rating | IPX7 | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx7 | IPx4 |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | — | Yes |
