vs
3.0Noise control & calls5.1
Why is Rockerz 255 Pro better than Twins Fuse 2?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx7 vs IPx4+75%
Why is Twins Fuse 2 better than Rockerz 255 Pro?
- Active noise cancellingNo · Rockerz 255 Pro: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Impedance | 255 Ω | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | — | Yes |
| Microphones | — | 2 |
| Noise reduction for calls | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | — | 8 h |
| Battery life with ANC | — | 28 h |
| Total with charging case | — | 36 h |
| Battery capacity | 500 mAh | — |
| Charging time | — | 2 h |
| Quick charge (claimed) | — | 10 min → 2 h |
| Fast charging support | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | — |
| Multipoint (two devices) | — | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Voice assistant | — | Google Assistant, Siri |
| Companion app | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Protection rating | IPX7 | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx7 | IPx4 |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | — | Yes |
