How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. M Metal Logo TWS ENC Bluetooth-Kopfhörer vs BUDS Pro

BMW M Metal Logo TWS ENC Bluetooth-Kopfhörer vs Vivo BUDS Pro

What M Metal Logo TWS ENC Bluetooth-Kopfhörer does better (1) and where BUDS Pro wins (2) — every spec side by side.

BMW M Metal Logo TWS ENC Bluetooth-Kopfhörer
7.6Score
1 advantage≈ $50
vs
Vivo BUDS Pro
Vivo · 2026BUDS Pro
7.6Score
2 advantages≈ $55
Higher score
3.0Noise control & calls3.0
9.8Battery9.8

Why is M Metal Logo TWS ENC Bluetooth-Kopfhörer better than BUDS Pro?

  1. Battery life30 h vs 13 h2.3×

Why is BUDS Pro better than M Metal Logo TWS ENC Bluetooth-Kopfhörer?

  1. Bluetooth version5.3 vs 6.1+15%
  2. Charging time1.5 h vs 1 h+50%
Specifications

Side by side

Vivo BUDS ProVivo BUDS Pro≈ $557.6
Sound
FitOpen-earIn-ear
Ear cup design—Closed-back
Driver type—Dynamic
Driver size—11 mm
Lowest frequency—20 Hz
Highest frequency—20,000 Hz
Impedance16 Ω—
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNoNo
Battery & charging
Battery life30 h13 h
Total with charging case—55 h
Charging time1.5 h1 h
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.36.1
USB-CYesYes
Low-latency game mode—Yes
Design & build
Protection ratingIPX5—
Water resistance (IPx)IPx5—
ColoursBlack—
Features
Hands-free callsYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare