- Amidio
- Compare
- M Metal Logo TWS ENC Bluetooth-Kopfhörer vs Melobuds N65 kabellose In-Ear-Kopfhörer ANC Bluetooth 6.0
BMW M Metal Logo TWS ENC Bluetooth-Kopfhörer vs QCY Melobuds N65 kabellose In-Ear-Kopfhörer ANC Bluetooth 6.0
What M Metal Logo TWS ENC Bluetooth-Kopfhörer does better (0) and where Melobuds N65 kabellose In-Ear-Kopfhörer ANC Bluetooth 6.0 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.0Noise control & calls3.0
Why is M Metal Logo TWS ENC Bluetooth-Kopfhörer better than Melobuds N65 kabellose In-Ear-Kopfhörer ANC Bluetooth 6.0?
M Metal Logo TWS ENC Bluetooth-Kopfhörer has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Melobuds N65 kabellose In-Ear-Kopfhörer ANC Bluetooth 6.0 better than M Metal Logo TWS ENC Bluetooth-Kopfhörer?
- Battery life30 h vs 50 h+67%
- Bluetooth version5.3 vs 6+13%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Open-ear | — |
| Impedance | 16 Ω | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | No |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 30 h | 50 h |
| Charging time | 1.5 h | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 6 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | LDAC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | Yes |
| aptX | — | No |
| LDAC | — | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Protection rating | IPX5 | IPX5 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx5 |
| Colours | Black | White |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
