How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Pulse M vs Era 300

Bluesound Pulse M vs Sonos Era 300

What Pulse M does better (2) and where Era 300 wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Bluesound Pulse M
Bluesound · 2022Pulse M
5.0Score
2 advantages≈ $590
Higher score
vs
Sonos Era 300
Sonos · 2023Era 300
0 advantages≈ $440
5.5Connectivity4.5
Dimensions

Size comparison

Pulse MEra 300
335 × 172155260 × 160185
Pulse MEra 300Difference
Height172 mm160 mm+12 mm
Width335 mm260 mm+75 mm
Depth155 mm185 mm−30 mm
Weight3,600 g4,470 g−870 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Pulse M better than Era 300?

  1. Weight3,600 g vs 4,470 g+24%
  2. aptXYes · Era 300: No

Why is Era 300 better than Pulse M?

Era 300 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Sound
Output power60 W—
Speaker channels2.0Stereo
Channel count2—
Dolby Atmos—Yes
Adjustable equaliser—Yes
StereoYesYes
Battery & charging
Mains poweredYesYes
Battery powered (portable)NoNo
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version—5
Bluetooth codecsaptX, SBCSBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)NoNo
aptXYesNo
LDACNoNo
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
Optical inputYes—
Smart & streaming
Wi-FiYesYes
AirPlay—Yes
Spotify ConnectYesYes
MultiroomYesYes
Voice assistantAlexaAlexa
Voice assistant built inYesYes
Companion appYesYes
Design & build
Weight3,600 g4,470 g
Width335 mm260 mm
Height172 mm160 mm
Depth155 mm185 mm
Features
Hands-free calls—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare