How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Pulse M vs Ace 30 Wireless

Bluesound Pulse M vs Piega Ace 30 Wireless

What Pulse M does better (1) and where Ace 30 Wireless wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Bluesound Pulse M
Bluesound · 2022Pulse M
5.0Score
1 advantage≈ $590
Higher score
vs
Piega Ace 30 Wireless
Piega · 2023Ace 30 Wireless
1 advantage≈ $970
Dimensions

Size comparison

Pulse MAce 30 Wireless
335 × 172155140 × 220160
Pulse MAce 30 WirelessDifference
Height172 mm220 mm−48 mm
Width335 mm140 mm+195 mm
Depth155 mm160 mm−5 mm
Weight3,600 g3,000 g+600 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Pulse M better than Ace 30 Wireless?

  1. aptXYes · Ace 30 Wireless: No

Why is Ace 30 Wireless better than Pulse M?

  1. Weight3,600 g vs 3,000 g+20%
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
Output power60 W—
Speaker channels2.02.0
Channel count22
Lowest frequency—50 Hz
Highest frequency—40,000 Hz
StereoYesYes
Battery & charging
Mains poweredYesNo
Battery powered (portable)NoNo
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth codecsaptX, SBCSBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)NoNo
aptXYesNo
LDACNoNo
3.5 mm jack / AUXYes—
Optical inputYes—
Smart & streaming
Wi-FiYesYes
AirPlay—Yes
Chromecast / Google Cast—Yes
Spotify ConnectYesYes
MultiroomYesYes
Voice assistantAlexa—
Voice assistant built inYesYes
Companion appYes—
Design & build
Weight3,600 g3,000 g
Width335 mm140 mm
Height172 mm220 mm
Depth155 mm160 mm
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare