How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Verio 200 vs REAL Blue TWS 3

beyerdynamic Verio 200 vs Teufel REAL Blue TWS 3

What Verio 200 does better (2) and where REAL Blue TWS 3 wins (4) — every spec side by side.

beyerdynamic Verio 200
beyerdynamic · 2024Verio 200
4.6Score
2 advantages≈ $110
vs
Teufel REAL Blue TWS 3
Teufel · 2024REAL Blue TWS 3
7.4Score
4 advantages≈ $95
Higher score
3.0Noise control & calls7.2
5.9Battery5.7

Why is Verio 200 better than REAL Blue TWS 3?

  1. Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes · REAL Blue TWS 3: No
  2. aptXYes · REAL Blue TWS 3: No

Why is REAL Blue TWS 3 better than Verio 200?

  1. Active noise cancellingNo · Verio 200: Yes
  2. Battery life8 h vs 9 h+12%
  3. Lowest frequency20 Hz vs 10 Hz2×
  4. Total with charging case35 h vs 37 h+6%
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Ear cup design—Closed-back
Driver type—Dynamic
Driver size—12 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz10 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Hi-Res AudioYes—
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNoYes
Transparency / ambient mode—Yes
Battery & charging
Battery life8 h9 h
Battery life with ANC—5 h
Total with charging case35 h37 h
Battery capacity—45 mAh
Charging time—2 h
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.35.3
Bluetooth codecsaptX Adaptive, AAC, SBCAAC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)YesNo
aptXYesNo
LDACNoNo
Multipoint (two devices)—Yes
USB-C—Yes
Design & build
Protection ratingIP54IPX4
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx4
Dust protection (IP)5—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare