Why is Verio 200 better than AeroClip?
- aptXYes · AeroClip: No
- Total with charging case35 h vs 32 h+9%
- Driver size16.2 mm vs 12 mm+35%
Why is AeroClip better than Verio 200?
- Active noise cancellingNo · Verio 200: Yes
- LDACNo · Verio 200: Yes
- Earbud weight (each)10.8 g vs 5.9 g+83%
- Charging time1.5 h vs 1 h+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Open-back | Open-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 16.2 mm | 12 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | — | 16 Ω |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | Yes |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | Yes |
| Microphones | — | 4 |
| Noise reduction for calls | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 8 h | 8 h |
| Total with charging case | 35 h | 32 h |
| Charging time | 1.5 h | 1 h |
| Quick charge (claimed) | — | 10 min → 3 h |
| Fast charging support | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth codecs | aptX Adaptive, AAC, SBC | LDAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | Yes |
| aptX | Yes | No |
| LDAC | No | Yes |
| Multipoint (two devices) | — | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Companion app | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 10.8 g | 5.9 g |
| Protection rating | IP54 | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Dust protection (IP) | 5 | 5 |
| Colours | — | Glacier Blue, Midnight Black, Champagne Mist, Rosy Brown |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
