beyerdynamic Verio 200 vs Sennheiser Accentum True Wireless

What Verio 200 does better (3) and where Accentum True Wireless wins (4) — every spec side by side.

beyerdynamic · 2024Verio 200

5.1Score

3 advantages≈ $95

5.8Score

4 advantages≈ $100

Higher score

3.1Noise control & calls5.2

6.3Battery5.5

2.2Build & features4.1

Why is Verio 200 better than Accentum True Wireless?

Specifications

Only differences	beyerdynamic Verio 200≈ $955.1	Sennheiser Accentum True Wireless≈ $1005.8
Sound
Fit	In-ear	In-ear
Ear cup design	Open-back	Closed-back
Driver type	Dynamic	Dynamic
Driver size	16.2 mm	7 mm
Lowest frequency	20 Hz	5 Hz
Highest frequency	20,000 Hz	21,000 Hz
Sensitivity	—	107 dB
Hi-Res Audio	Yes	—
Adjustable equaliser	Yes	Yes
Noise control
Active noise cancelling	No	Yes
Transparency / ambient mode	—	Yes
Microphones	—	2
Battery & charging
Battery life	8 h	8 h
Battery life with ANC	—	6 h
Total with charging case	35 h	28 h
Charging time	1.5 h	1.5 h
Fast charging support	—	Yes
Wireless charging (case)	—	Yes
Connectivity
Wireless	Yes	Yes
Bluetooth version	5.3	5.3
Bluetooth codecs	aptX Adaptive, AAC, SBC	aptX, AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)	Yes	No
aptX	Yes	Yes
LDAC	No	No
Multipoint (two devices)	—	Yes
USB-C	Yes	Yes
Smart & streaming
Companion app	—	Yes
Design & build
Earbud weight (each)	10.8 g	5.5 g
Protection rating	IP54	IP54
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx4	IPx4
Dust protection (IP)	5	5
Colours	—	Black, White, Blue
Features
Touch controls	Yes	Yes
Hands-free calls	Yes	Yes