How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Verio 200 vs Minor IV

beyerdynamic Verio 200 vs Marshall Minor IV

What Verio 200 does better (4) and where Minor IV wins (0) — every spec side by side.

beyerdynamic Verio 200
beyerdynamic · 2024Verio 200
4.6Score
4 advantages≈ $110
vs
Marshall Minor IV
Marshall · 2024Minor IV
4.7Score
0 advantages≈ $100
Higher score
3.0Noise control & calls3.0
5.9Battery5.4

Why is Verio 200 better than Minor IV?

  1. Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes · Minor IV: No
  2. Battery life8 h vs 7 h+14%
  3. aptXYes · Minor IV: No
  4. Total with charging case35 h vs 30 h+17%

Why is Minor IV better than Verio 200?

Minor IV has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Ear cup design—Closed-back
Driver type—Dynamic
Driver size—12 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance—32 Ω
Hi-Res AudioYes—
Adjustable equaliser—Yes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNoNo
Battery & charging
Battery life8 h7 h
Total with charging case35 h30 h
Charging time—1 h
Fast charging support—Yes
Wireless charging (case)—Yes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.35.3
Bluetooth codecsaptX Adaptive, AAC, SBCLC3, AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)YesNo
aptXYesNo
LDACNoNo
Multipoint (two devices)—Yes
LE Audio—Yes
USB-C—Yes
Smart & streaming
Companion app—Yes
Design & build
Earbud weight (each)—7.4 g
Protection ratingIP54IPX4
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx4
Dust protection (IP)5—
Features
Touch controls—Yes
Wear detection (auto pause)—Yes
Hands-free calls—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare