How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Verio 200 vs Minor IV

beyerdynamic Verio 200 vs Marshall Minor IV

What Verio 200 does better (5) and where Minor IV wins (2) — every spec side by side.

beyerdynamic Verio 200
beyerdynamic · 2024Verio 200
5.1Score
5 advantages≈ $95
Higher score
vs
Marshall Minor IV
Marshall · 2024Minor IV
4.8Score
2 advantages≈ $100
3.1Noise control & calls3.1
6.3Battery5.5
2.2Build & features3.7

Why is Verio 200 better than Minor IV?

  1. Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes · Minor IV: No
  2. Battery life8 h vs 7 h+14%
  3. aptXYes · Minor IV: No
  4. Total with charging case35 h vs 30 h+17%
  5. Driver size16.2 mm vs 12 mm+35%

Why is Minor IV better than Verio 200?

  1. Charging time1.5 h vs 1 h+50%
  2. Earbud weight (each)10.8 g vs 7.4 g+46%
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Ear cup designOpen-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size16.2 mm12 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance—32 Ω
Hi-Res AudioYes—
Adjustable equaliserYesYes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNoNo
Battery & charging
Battery life8 h7 h
Total with charging case35 h30 h
Charging time1.5 h1 h
Fast charging support—Yes
Wireless charging (case)—Yes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.35.3
Bluetooth codecsaptX Adaptive, AAC, SBCLC3, AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)YesNo
aptXYesNo
LDACNoNo
Multipoint (two devices)—Yes
LE Audio—Yes
USB-CYesYes
Smart & streaming
Companion app—Yes
Design & build
Earbud weight (each)10.8 g7.4 g
Protection ratingIP54IPX4
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx4
Dust protection (IP)5—
Features
Touch controlsYesYes
Wear detection (auto pause)—Yes
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare