vs
3.1Noise control & calls7.2
6.3Battery4.0
2.2Build & features7.3
Why is Verio 200 better than Svanar Wireless LE?
- Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes · Svanar Wireless LE: No
- Battery life8 h vs 7 h+14%
- Total with charging case35 h vs 24 h+46%
- aptXYes · Svanar Wireless LE: No
- Charging time1.5 h vs 2 h+33%
Why is Svanar Wireless LE better than Verio 200?
- Active noise cancellingNo · Verio 200: Yes
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx5+25%
- Lowest frequency20 Hz vs 10 Hz2×
- Highest frequency20,000 Hz vs 35,000 Hz+75%
- Earbud weight (each)10.8 g vs 8 g+35%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Open-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 16.2 mm | — |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 10 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 35,000 Hz |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 8 h | 7 h |
| Battery life with ANC | — | 6 h |
| Total with charging case | 35 h | 24 h |
| Charging time | 1.5 h | 2 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth codecs | aptX Adaptive, AAC, SBC | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | No |
| aptX | Yes | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Low-latency game mode | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 10.8 g | 8 g |
| Protection rating | IP54 | IPX5 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx5 |
| Dust protection (IP) | 5 | — |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
beyerdynamic Verio 200vsradius Hear-scape Beethoven HP-B100BTvs
beyerdynamic Verio 200vsEarFun Air 2vs
beyerdynamic Verio 200vsEarFun Air 2 NCvs
beyerdynamic Verio 200vsEdifier X1 Lite
vs
HifiMan Svanar Wireless LEvsfinal ZE3000 SV6.76.8vsHifiMan Svanar Wireless LEvsradius Hear-scape Beethoven HP-B100BT