4.0Noise control & calls4.0
Why is T1 (3rd Gen) better than SR-L500 MK2?
- Lowest frequency5 Hz vs 7 Hz+40%
- Highest frequency50,000 Hz vs 41,000 Hz+22%
Why is SR-L500 MK2 better than T1 (3rd Gen)?
- Weight360 g vs 351 g+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Over-ear | Over-ear |
| Ear cup design | Open-back | Open-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | — |
| Number of drivers | — | 1 |
| Lowest frequency | 5 Hz | 7 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 50,000 Hz | 41,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 32 Ω | — |
| Sensitivity | 100 dB | 101 dB |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | No | No |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 360 g | 351 g |
| Colours | Black, Silver | Black |
Related comparisons
vs
Bang & Olufsen BeoPlay H95vsbeyerdynamic T1 (3rd Gen)
vs
Focal Clear MG Professionalvsbeyerdynamic T1 (3rd Gen)
vs
Audio Technica ATH-WP900vsbeyerdynamic T1 (3rd Gen)
vs
beyerdynamic T5 (3rd Gen)vsbeyerdynamic T1 (3rd Gen)
vs
Focal Clear MG ProfessionalvsStax SR-L500 MK2
vs
Bang & Olufsen BeoPlay H95vsStax SR-L500 MK2
