vs
9.6Build & features3.3
Why is DT 72 IE better than WF-1000XM6?
- Weight21 g vs 47 g2.2×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
- Lowest frequency5 Hz vs 20 Hz4×
- Highest frequency40,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz2×
Why is WF-1000XM6 better than DT 72 IE?
WF-1000XM6 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | Bone conduction |
| Ear cup design | — | Closed-back |
| Driver type | — | Dynamic |
| Driver size | — | 8.4 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 5 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 40,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 16 Ω | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | Yes |
| Adjustable equaliser | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | — | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | — | Yes |
| Microphones | — | 2 |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | — | 12 h |
| Battery life with ANC | — | 8 h |
| Charging time | — | 1.5 h |
| Wireless charging (case) | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | — | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | LDAC, LC3, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | Yes |
| aptX | — | No |
| LDAC | — | Yes |
| Multipoint (two devices) | — | Yes |
| LE Audio | — | Yes |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 21 g | 47 g |
| Earbud weight (each) | — | 6.5 g |
| Protection rating | IP68 | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx4 |
| Dust protection (IP) | 6 | — |
| Colours | Black | — |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | — | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | — | Yes |
