vs
3.8Noise control & calls7.8
Why is DT-270 Pro better than HA-S99N?
- Lowest frequency5 Hz vs 20 Hz4×
- Highest frequency24,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz+20%
Why is HA-S99N better than DT-270 Pro?
- Active noise cancellingNo · DT-270 Pro: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Over-ear | — |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | — |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | — | 36 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 5 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 24,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 45 Ω | — |
| Sensitivity | 96 dB | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | — | 50 h |
| Battery life with ANC | — | 35 h |
| Charging time | — | 3 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | — | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | No |
| aptX | — | No |
| LDAC | — | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | — | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 194 g | 195 g |
| Foldable | — | Yes |
| Colours | Black | — |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | — | Yes |
