beyerdynamic Aventho 100 vs Marshall Milton A.N.C.

What Aventho 100 does better (1) and where Milton A.N.C. wins (5) — every spec side by side.

beyerdynamic · 2025Aventho 100

7.8Score

1 advantage≈ $190

Higher score

Marshall · 2026Milton A.N.C.

7.8Score

5 advantages≈ $170

6.4Noise control & calls6.8

6.6Battery7.7

8.2Connectivity8.7

Why is Aventho 100 better than Milton A.N.C.?

Specifications

Only differences	beyerdynamic Aventho 100≈ $1907.8	Marshall Milton A.N.C.≈ $1707.8
Sound
Fit	On-ear	On-ear
Ear cup design	Closed-back	Closed-back
Driver type	Dynamic	Dynamic
Driver size	—	32 mm
Lowest frequency	20 Hz	20 Hz
Highest frequency	20,000 Hz	20,000 Hz
Impedance	48 Ω	32 Ω
Sensitivity	—	99 dB
Spatial / 3D audio	—	Yes
Hi-Res Audio	Yes	Yes
Adjustable equaliser	Yes	Yes
Noise control
Active noise cancelling	Yes	Yes
Adaptive ANC	Yes	Yes
Transparency / ambient mode	Yes	Yes
Microphones	—	6
Battery & charging
Battery life	60 h	80 h
Battery life with ANC	40 h	50 h
Charging time	—	2 h
Quick charge (claimed)	15 min → 15 h	—
Fast charging support	Yes	Yes
Wireless charging (case)	—	No
Connectivity
Wireless	Yes	Yes
Bluetooth version	5.4	6
Bluetooth codecs	aptX Lossless, aptX Adaptive, AAC, SBC	LDAC, LC3, AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)	Yes	Yes
aptX	Yes	No
LDAC	No	Yes
Multipoint (two devices)	Yes	Yes
LE Audio	—	Yes
USB-C	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm jack / AUX	Yes	Yes
Smart & streaming
Companion app	Yes	Yes
Design & build
Weight	220 g	200 g
Foldable	Yes	Yes
Features
Hands-free calls	Yes	Yes