beyerdynamic Aventho 100 vs JBL Tour One M3

What Aventho 100 does better (2) and where Tour One M3 wins (4) — every spec side by side.

beyerdynamic · 2025Aventho 100

7.7Score

2 advantages≈ $190

7.9Score

4 advantages≈ $230

Higher score

6.7Noise control & calls6.9

6.6Battery7.4

8.1Connectivity4.5

Why is Aventho 100 better than Tour One M3?

Specifications

Only differences	beyerdynamic Aventho 100≈ $1907.7	JBL Tour One M3≈ $2307.9
Sound
Fit	On-ear	Over-ear
Ear cup design	Closed-back	Closed-back
Driver type	Dynamic	Dynamic
Driver size	—	40 mm
Lowest frequency	20 Hz	10 Hz
Highest frequency	20,000 Hz	40,000 Hz
Impedance	48 Ω	18 Ω
Sensitivity	—	122 dB
Spatial / 3D audio	—	Yes
Head tracking	—	Yes
Hi-Res Audio	Yes	Yes
Adjustable equaliser	Yes	Yes
Noise control
Active noise cancelling	Yes	Yes
Adaptive ANC	Yes	Yes
Transparency / ambient mode	Yes	Yes
Microphones	—	8
Noise reduction for calls	—	Yes
Battery & charging
Battery life	60 h	70 h
Battery life with ANC	40 h	40 h
Charging time	—	2 h
Quick charge (claimed)	15 min → 15 h	5 min → 1 h
Fast charging support	Yes	Yes
Connectivity
Wireless	Yes	Yes
Bluetooth version	5.4	5.3
Bluetooth codecs	aptX Lossless, aptX Adaptive, AAC, SBC	LDAC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)	Yes	Yes
aptX	Yes	No
LDAC	No	Yes
Multipoint (two devices)	Yes	Yes
LE Audio	—	Yes
USB-C	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm jack / AUX	Yes	Yes
Smart & streaming
Companion app	Yes	Yes
Design & build
Weight	220 g	278 g
Foldable	Yes	Yes
Features
Touch controls	—	Yes
Hands-free calls	Yes	Yes