vs
6.7Noise control & calls7.9
6.6Battery2.9
Why is Aventho 100 better than QuietComfort SC?
- Battery life60 h vs 24 h2.5×
- Battery life with ANC40 h vs 24 h+67%
- Weight220 g vs 240 g+9%
- Bluetooth version5.4 vs 5.1+6%
Why is QuietComfort SC better than Aventho 100?
QuietComfort SC has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | On-ear | On-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | — |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | — |
| Impedance | 48 Ω | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | Yes |
| Adaptive ANC | Yes | — |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 60 h | 24 h |
| Battery life with ANC | 40 h | 24 h |
| Charging time | — | 2.5 h |
| Quick charge (claimed) | 15 min → 15 h | — |
| Fast charging support | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.1 |
| Bluetooth codecs | aptX Lossless, aptX Adaptive, AAC, SBC | — |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | — |
| aptX | Yes | — |
| LDAC | No | — |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Companion app | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 220 g | 240 g |
| Foldable | Yes | — |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Audio Technica ATH-R50xvsbeyerdynamic Aventho 100vs
beyerdynamic Aventho 100vsSennheiser HD 505 SE Copper Edition
vsPositive Grid Spark NEOvsbeyerdynamic Aventho 100
vsbeyerdynamic Aventho 300vsbeyerdynamic Aventho 1008.27.7
vsSennheiser HD 550vsbeyerdynamic Aventho 100
vs
Bose QuietComfort SCvsDell WL5024