How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. AMIRON 300 vs EAH-AZ60M2

beyerdynamic AMIRON 300 vs Technics EAH-AZ60M2

What AMIRON 300 does better (4) and where EAH-AZ60M2 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

beyerdynamic AMIRON 300
beyerdynamic · 2024AMIRON 300
7.9Score
4 advantages≈ $180
Higher score
vs
Technics EAH-AZ60M2
Technics · 2023EAH-AZ60M2
6.2Score
1 advantage≈ $180
7.0Sound5.8
8.4Noise control & calls9.0
7.2Battery4.3
5.7Build & features3.1

Why is AMIRON 300 better than EAH-AZ60M2?

  1. Battery life10 h vs 7 h+43%
  2. Total with charging case40 h vs 25 h+60%
  3. Earbud weight (each)4.4 g vs 7 g+59%
  4. Driver size10 mm vs 8 mm+25%

Why is EAH-AZ60M2 better than AMIRON 300?

  1. Microphones6 vs 8+33%
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size10 mm8 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency40,000 Hz40,000 Hz
Impedance32 Ω—
Hi-Res AudioYesYes
Adjustable equaliserYesYes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Transparency / ambient modeYesYes
Microphones68
Noise reduction for callsYes—
Battery & charging
Battery life10 h7 h
Battery life with ANC7 h—
Total with charging case40 h25 h
Charging time2 h2 h
Fast charging supportYesYes
Wireless charging (case)YesYes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.35.3
Bluetooth codecsLDAC, AAC, SBCLDAC, AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)YesYes
aptXNoNo
LDACYesYes
Multipoint (two devices)YesYes
USB-CYesYes
Smart & streaming
Voice assistant—Alexa
Companion appYes—
Design & build
Earbud weight (each)4.4 g7 g
Protection ratingIP54IPX4
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx4
Dust protection (IP)5—
Features
Touch controlsYesYes
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare