How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. AMIRON 300 vs OpenFit 2+ T921

beyerdynamic AMIRON 300 vs Shokz OpenFit 2+ T921

What AMIRON 300 does better (3) and where OpenFit 2+ T921 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

beyerdynamic AMIRON 300
beyerdynamic · 2024AMIRON 300
8.0Score
3 advantages≈ $180
vs
Shokz OpenFit 2+ T921
Shokz · 2026OpenFit 2+ T921
8.9Score
2 advantages≈ $190
Higher score
7.2Battery8.5
5.7Build & features7.2

Why is AMIRON 300 better than OpenFit 2+ T921?

  1. Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes · OpenFit 2+ T921: No
  2. Earbud weight (each)4.4 g vs 9.4 g2.1×
  3. LDACYes · OpenFit 2+ T921: No

Why is OpenFit 2+ T921 better than AMIRON 300?

  1. Battery life10 h vs 11 h+10%
  2. Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx5+25%
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitIn-earOpen-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backOpen-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size10 mm—
Lowest frequency20 Hz—
Highest frequency40,000 Hz—
Impedance32 Ω—
Hi-Res AudioYes—
Adjustable equaliserYesYes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYes—
Transparency / ambient modeYes—
Microphones6—
Noise reduction for callsYes—
Battery & charging
Battery life10 h11 h
Battery life with ANC7 h—
Total with charging case40 h—
Charging time2 h—
Fast charging supportYes—
Wireless charging (case)YesYes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.35.4
Bluetooth codecsLDAC, AAC, SBCAAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)YesNo
aptXNoNo
LDACYesNo
Multipoint (two devices)YesYes
USB-CYesYes
Smart & streaming
Companion appYes—
Design & build
Earbud weight (each)4.4 g9.4 g
Protection ratingIP54IP55
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx5
Dust protection (IP)55
Colours—Black, Grey, Purple
Features
Touch controlsYesYes
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare