How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. AMIRON 300 vs RS 5200

beyerdynamic AMIRON 300 vs Sennheiser RS 5200

What AMIRON 300 does better (3) and where RS 5200 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

beyerdynamic AMIRON 300
beyerdynamic · 2024AMIRON 300
7.9Score
3 advantages≈ $180
Higher score
vs
Sennheiser RS 5200
Sennheiser · 2021RS 5200
5.8Score
2 advantages≈ $180
8.4Noise control & calls3.0
7.2Battery8.2

Why is AMIRON 300 better than RS 5200?

  1. Active noise cancellingYes · RS 5200: No
  2. Highest frequency40,000 Hz vs 16,000 Hz2.5×
  3. Charging time2 h vs 3 h+50%

Why is RS 5200 better than AMIRON 300?

  1. Battery life10 h vs 12 h+20%
  2. Lowest frequency20 Hz vs 15 Hz+33%
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Ear cup designClosed-back—
Driver typeDynamic—
Driver size10 mm—
Lowest frequency20 Hz15 Hz
Highest frequency40,000 Hz16,000 Hz
Impedance32 Ω—
Hi-Res AudioYes—
Adjustable equaliserYes—
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesNo
Transparency / ambient modeYes—
Microphones6—
Noise reduction for callsYes—
Battery & charging
Battery life10 h12 h
Battery life with ANC7 h—
Total with charging case40 h—
Charging time2 h3 h
Fast charging supportYes—
Wireless charging (case)Yes—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.3—
Bluetooth codecsLDAC, AAC, SBC—
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes—
aptXNo—
LDACYes—
Multipoint (two devices)Yes—
USB-CYes—
Smart & streaming
Companion appYes—
Design & build
Weight—61 g
Earbud weight (each)4.4 g—
Protection ratingIP54—
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4—
Dust protection (IP)5—
Colours—Black
Features
Touch controlsYes—
Hands-free callsYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare